|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
32
|
Posted - 2017.03.08 19:39:31 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:Questions & Answers
Q:Regarding the increased fighter signature & bug fix, have you thought about the impact to PvE? A: Yes, and run many test :) We believe that carrier ratting will continue to be viable after this change. Balanced carrier ratting is part of the goal of this change, and we'll be watching the results of this change closely, ready to iterate as needed.
Q:Could the fighter UI show the HP of the damaged fighter? A: This won't be coming in March, but it is something we're looking into! :)
Q:Its annoying when fighters stop after killing a target! A: We recognise that fighter behavior isn't ideal. Its something we'd like to iterate on in the future.
Step 1 : Change the behaviour of fighter when they kill a npc. Step 2: Change the fact sometimes you're fighter pilot don't want to move during 10 secondes with error message.
Step3 : Now you can make you're change.
But make step before 2 other, you will just make carrier useless in pve. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
33
|
Posted - 2017.03.09 17:22:37 -
[2] - Quote
This post need an answer of a dev. (i don't care of player answer).
1)When you give a lot of order you're squad stop : actually not a big deal, sometimes lost 1 fighter (1 for maybe 50 ano). After update maybe if it's 1 per anomaly it will be a big problem. 2) If you're connection have some latency (like ping to 2000 -3000 ms) and go back to normal , or a avearage ping of 500 ms ... You will loose fighter. Ping could come from player... and you're infrastructure => >Actually you do'nt loose fighter or mayber one for X anomaly. 3)if you don't play with keyboard shortcut for medical reason for exemple ... you can't use you're carrier anymore with a normal mouse. Or if you play on trackpad same problem. Actuallly you can , after you will loose free fighter.
So let me be clear : 1) Beug issue to solve, tou're problem we can write to support for each time it will happen. 2) Same as 1, unless you can proof it's the player connexion who lag (not the FAI, THE PLAYER connexion), beacause yes in some country when the player have sign to you're game he agree CGU... and law of his country. You could have legal issue, so prepare to reimburse. 3) Legal issue if you want more detail and you are CCP employee pm me.
So i repeat before change fighter, solve problem 1, after make fighter auto orbit when they kill, and after make you're actual change.
Thank. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
37
|
Posted - 2017.03.11 13:00:53 -
[3] - Quote
In fact "solution" is to order to you're fighter to orbit an item when they end to kill.
Problem : BAd connexion with a suddently ping => bye to you're fighter. You can't play with you're 2 hand? You will have not time to make they orbit and fire before loose one.
It"s not a problem of the nerf, it become a problem of game accessibility.
So true question is : Why CCP decide to take sanction against player with the badest connexion ? Why CCP decide to destroy content ?(less carrier in space, less people who farm, less newbro who salvage, less target for roammer ... less content). Why CCP decide to make decision to take sanction against people who can't use 2 hand to play?
CCP don't reed here, maybe after update contact press of you're country and explain to they a game company take sanction against people in fonction of they're connexion/health... And see how many time before CCP decide to answer by allow to fighter to orbit wreck when they kill and not to stop.
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
37
|
Posted - 2017.03.14 17:02:24 -
[4] - Quote
Change of game accessibility. Time to attack CCP in justice. (i said game accessibility, now you must micro manage with youre 2 hand, to don't loose foghter, so people who can't are penalised... and it's was not the case whe i have register to the game).
Game accessibility change can not be cover per you're EULA, beacause law of a lot of country in the world manage this.
So plan to make CCP read feedback: - Support for each fighter lost due to "stop movement" beacasue they're own dev aprove it's not normal. - Attack in justice if you're law permit to attack for game accessibility change. -During fan fest all player must ask : Carrier Change ?Best Change?
If all player do this CCP will back to the old system in few hours.
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.14 22:48:07 -
[5] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Seems like average IQ of the whole forum can be improved if you would just shut the **** up with the nonsense video of how someone finally managed to not lose any fighters in a haven by imitating pulloff with orbit rock command, sheer luck, and ruined ISK/hour due to fighters being at 4 times faloff distance at the moment something is targeted. All this in ezmode goonspace on NPC faction with no missiles, barely any webs, no target painters, no ecm, no tracking disruptors, and no OP tracking battlecruiers.
You need to make a lot of micro management, problematic is : how make people with bad connexion or who can"t for some reason use keyboard and mouse in same time ? They can't farm. without heavy loss. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.16 17:08:22 -
[6] - Quote
Martin Vanzyl wrote:Somebody mentioned the latest economic report as a reason for the carrier fighter nerf, and I rarely pay attention to those economic reports, but my interest was peaked. Two clicks later and I'm staring at the Isk Sink and Faucet's graph and WTF?! https://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Feb_2017/9aaa_top.sinks.faucets.over.time.pngSomething, starting in mid April 2016 has caused Bounty Payouts to absolutely shoot into the stratosphere! https://updates.eveonline.com/date/2016-04-27/ The Citadel/Caps expansion. Between then and now Bounty Payout has gone from a level of 1Tril Isk to peaking in Mid February 2017 at 2.2 TRILLION ISK, whilst the Sinks barely changed at all. Its NOT a good idea to just INJECT that amount of money into your economy to that extent that quickly. That leads to currency devaluation and money oversupply. Google a bit to see why that's BAD. CCP can see what ship/activity is earning these the most, I assume. So if this is what they have to do to keep EVE's economy afloat... and by extension, the game going, which puts food on their tables, keeps the lights on, by all means.
And you know what ? With this expension the number of player in game have drastically augmented during the same period... |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.16 19:58:12 -
[7] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Black Salt wrote:Gadzooki wrote:
Ahh Black salt, the saltiest salt of all.
threaten legal action - check threaten to cancel account - check Offer up sound changes that will go unnoticed because of the tone of your first paragraph - check
Better check the salt levels in the ocean before we proceed
Perhaps I made this character for the specific reasons of being salty on forums ~ Or perhaps it's one lucky twist of fate! And I don't make threats, simply made note of the fact that it may be a violation of existing consumer acts, and with respect to the account not being sub'd, it's not a threat if I've already cancelled it and started using my time on other games already. And if people wish to ignore the sound suggestion to balance, then that's fine but anyone who is looking at forums for feedback should fully expect to get the following: 1) Salt 2) Trolls and probably needs to be able to still read comments objectively. P.S. I'd have described Black Salt as the Edgiest of Salts but Do you really think you have any legal protection against CCP nerfing your pixel spaceship? If it was the case, every single MMO designer would be in court every single patches for having nerfed someone's pixels. Get real...
Not for nerfing, but to change accebility you can. You need to have a great apm ... when you have signe to the game need only medium. If you can"t use you're 2 hand to play with keyboard for any reason : It's a consumer act violation in a lot of country.
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.16 22:44:22 -
[8] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:Not for nerfing, but to change accebility you can. You need to have a great apm ... when you have signe to the game need only medium. If you can"t use you're 2 hand to play with keyboard for any reason : It's a consumer act violation in a lot of country.
Um... this is flatly false, even I know enough law to know that. If you're disabled you have no reasonable expectation to be able to play a game at the same level as someone with two functioning hands and the same goes for any other disability. If we were to follow your issue here to its logical conclusion then FPS games would also need to accommodate one-handed players, blind players, and all sorts of other things that it's simply ridiculous to expect them to accommodate without dumbing down the game to the point of removing all challenge from it. I'm all for more discussion on these changes, preferably with examples, but this line of argument is just ridiculous.
When you sign a contract with a companie for a service, they can change some rules of the service if they 're eula said they can. BUT if the accesibility of the service change due to this it's against consumer act.
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.17 17:54:10 -
[9] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:[quote=Dictateur Imperator]Not for nerfing, but to change accebility you can. You need to have a great apm ... when you have signe to the game need only medium. If you can"t use you're 2 hand to play with keyboard for any reason : It's a consumer act violation in a lot of country.
Um... this is flatly false, even I know enough law to know that.
If you're disabled you have no reasonable expectation to be able to play a game at the same level as someone with two functioning hands and the same goes for any other disability. If we were to follow your issue here to its logical conclusion then FPS games would also need to accommodate one-handed players, blind players, and all sorts of other things that it's simply ridiculous to expect them to accommodate without dumbing down the game to the point of removing all challenge from it.
I'm all for more discussion on these changes, preferably with examples, but this line of argument is just ridiculous.[/quote
If you sell a blind people comptaible game and change after ... you are against consumer act. Here it's same in fact. You muste never you're accessibility. And if you want you must paid the price .
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
39
|
Posted - 2017.03.17 20:39:36 -
[10] - Quote
Darkligh 81 wrote:Hi All
Telling your fighters to orbit does work. Exactly the same as I always ran them, I have run Havens/Sanctums today others were loosing fighters in.
Tell the fighters to orbit your next target just before your fighters cycle the killing blow. When a new group spawns immediatley tell them to orbit your first target (or a target, doesn't matter) then lock the targets while they are on their way to the new spawn.
Don't wait for them to kill the target then tell them to orbit, or lock a target and then orbit, by then it's too late. Orbit first.
If you still struggle throw in a Capital drone durability rig or 2 for a bit of extra hp (also helps in case of a DC) Yes you warp slower then if you were running a max tick fit but you don't loose fighters.
I play with a very bad connection ( around 1000ms-2000ms latency) and if I can keep my fighters alive you should be able to as well.
Hope that helps.
Same latency they have alpha my fighter (and i have drone durability rigs + thanatos perfect).
And when you play only with mouse: they kill fighter to.
CCP must correct beug before patch something. |
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.20 17:54:03 -
[11] - Quote
Cade Windstalker wrote:March rabbit wrote:Tested this new patch with my supercarrier. Nothing really changed. And it was expected more or less having 1 Haven being done in 5:30. Most of the time NPC targeted my fighters but it is too fast for them to do any significant damage anyway. So this change mainly targeted carrier pilots. And i'm still not convinced that they needed it Doesn't seem to have even affected Carriers much beyond multi-box/AFK capability. So far I've seen no change from people ratting Blood Raiders, Sansha, Guristas, Rogue Drones, and Serpentis. Haven't been able to find a video or person who does Angels though and there's been some concern raised over their TPs and Webs. If anyone has a video with the changes I'm curious if the concerns with Angels have been as overblown as those with other factions.
I'm mono account, and i can't often use my 2 hand for some IRL problem. I'm affect. And before patch you can't afk carrier so stop think people want AFK. But befor epatch yes you can give order to you're fighter to attack nex target before they die, or you can have 1 000 ms ping without loose 2 fighter.
When we read you we understand : you don't hvae play carrier before update and not after. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.21 22:11:59 -
[12] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Vladebor wrote:Best solution imo for capital ratting would be to simply add new anomaly type (or tweak sanctums) so they have less small ships and have more capital ships. It does not even need to be worth much more income per tick than havens now - just require less clicking overall because the way it is now is really too much. Many people are playing eve because it does not require so many clicking and running around like other games. Not to mention that would be fun to have more really big ship fights - I came to this game for this. If it's too much clicking, you can always do something else than carrier/super ratting...
Yes but if we want play game with you must do a lot of apm we don"t play to eve. We we have sign for play we have sign for an other accessibility of game. So if ccp want to change it they can ... they mist paid (and not only give back money of time who yu have on account). |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.22 23:13:52 -
[13] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:Frostys Virpio wrote:Vladebor wrote:Best solution imo for capital ratting would be to simply add new anomaly type (or tweak sanctums) so they have less small ships and have more capital ships. It does not even need to be worth much more income per tick than havens now - just require less clicking overall because the way it is now is really too much. Many people are playing eve because it does not require so many clicking and running around like other games. Not to mention that would be fun to have more really big ship fights - I came to this game for this. If it's too much clicking, you can always do something else than carrier/super ratting... Yes but if we want play game with you must do a lot of apm we don"t play to eve. We we have sign for play we have sign for an other accessibility of game. So if ccp want to change it they can ... they mist paid (and not only give back money of time who yu have on account). What breach of contract have they done for you to think you should get reimbursement from them?
Not contract, but legal, change game accessibility is a breach in law in near all country. Exemple for you to understand better : sell car to people who don"t have leg ... and after 3 month said "finnally no we change you must have leg for this car". It 's a terrible exemple, but at basis this kind of law is for this thing. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.23 22:35:02 -
[14] - Quote
Legal procedure is starting for the game accessibility change. Legal service of CCP have no less of 24h before end of legal delay to answer.... after they will receive letter in real life , new delay ... and finally go in justice. It will take time but i don't care. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.26 19:25:24 -
[15] - Quote
Problem Addict wrote:OK really smart people. Tell your fighters to orbit the next target BEFORE your current target explodes.
They will still fire upon the current target until it explodes and will move onto the next designated "orbit" which you can then begin firing upon.
This will result in non-stop fightermovement and non-stop application of fighter DPS.
#getgood
You are really smart ... some people can't for RL reason. So be very smart and read all other people beofre post. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.03.27 17:26:27 -
[16] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:Legal procedure is starting for the game accessibility change. We will see. Keep us posted on your legal battle about a single feature in a game no longer being as accessible as it used to be. I really want to hear about it.
In fact no the first time CCP have legal problem... but i, general they finish per negociate when they understand it's not a joke or a fake .
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
40
|
Posted - 2017.04.14 21:51:50 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote: A: We recognise that fighter behavior isn't ideal. Its something we'd like to iterate on in the future.
So do it. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
41
|
Posted - 2017.04.16 11:55:06 -
[18] - Quote
Xantia Naari wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:Legal procedure is starting for the game accessibility change. We will see. HaHaHaHa ROFLMAO
Take time beacause you must send first thing to compagnie, after "lettre de mise en garde" and when all legal time are pass, you can attack.
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.01 13:45:43 -
[19] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:Questions & Answers
Q:Its annoying when fighters stop after killing a target! A: We recognise that fighter behavior isn't ideal. Its something we'd like to iterate on in the future.
UP
P.S: in the next few day , CCP maybe you must survey you're real mail. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.02 16:47:46 -
[20] - Quote
Trevize Demerzel wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:CCP Larrikin wrote:Questions & Answers
Q:Its annoying when fighters stop after killing a target! A: We recognize that fighter behavior isn't ideal. Its something we'd like to iterate on in the future. UP P.S: in the next few day , CCP maybe you must survey you're real mail. Ya they had time to nerf but no time to improve... The future is when? Same time as "soon(tm)".....
Maybe they will have time after legal action against they. |
|
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.09 17:17:13 -
[21] - Quote
Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote: Maybe they will have time after legal action against they.
The Judge wrote:HTFU *bangs gavel*
If you think it's a joke, read ilsandic law section penal 240 to 250. |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.14 10:27:43 -
[22] - Quote
ApolloF117 HUN wrote:i don't think ccp even reading this forum after the first 2-3 page, they just simply posted the **** they wanted then pace out like everything is ok :)
I'm sure some people of support and not dev read it.... |
Dictateur Imperator
Ab origine fidelis Get Off My Lawn
43
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 15:03:05 -
[23] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:ApolloF117 HUN wrote:Dictateur Imperator wrote:ApolloF117 HUN wrote:i don't think ccp even reading this forum after the first 2-3 page, they just simply posted the **** they wanted then pace out like everything is ok :) I'm sure some people of support and not dev read it.... Yeah that's a problem, devs make the game changes not the support you want devs to see it go to reddit. What? did you think they would use their own forums over a third party? why would they do that
They don't use forum, only to make announcement or in game event. They have beug they really don't care unless they looze player or tacke a legal action in they're face. Mayve it's CCP Seagulls fault: want to launch more updtae, always more things, but to avoid very little extension "speed some change". And so we looze stability for the game.
Idea to Seagulls to make a lot of little extension is not bad, but sometimes you must said "ok no, we are not ready we will publish this in some days or next extention".
No auto orbit of fighter after kill is one of this problem they just forget beacause they have speed develop other thing in the same times to make more new ability in game.
|
|
|
|